ICT centers and the access gap to formal higher education for the poor in Brazil
The recentinterest in technology and development in Brazil features a complex environment of actors including the state, industry, international aid and...
Information and communications technology (ICT) skills are often cited as a means to empower marginalized populations, particularly around acute needs such as employment. Over the last decade, technology training programs have been established a community training centers throughout Latin America to address these needs. This study examines the technological and socio-economic issues faced by two distinct groups that enroll in technology training for employability: at-risk youth and people with disabilities. Three questions framed the research: What drives users to technology centers? How do expectations of ICT trainees compare to labor market experiences reported by program graduates? What challenges do users and managers face?
The recentinterest in technology and development in Brazil features a complex environment of actors including the state, industry, international aid and...
Exposure to crime and violence, discrimination, and a structural lack of institutional support for education and human development continue to plague at-risk...
We examine here the role of ICT training within the aspirational ecology of marginalized peoples lacking local economic opportunities. Drawing off 60 in‐depth...
High rates of poverty, discrimination and social exclusion, a lack of institutional capacity for advocacy, and a growing dependence on technology access...
Organizing and advocacy from the grassroots, champions within national governments, and recently implemented legal reforms have made the Latin American...
Much recent work has looked at the various ways in which access to computing has impacted empowerment for people with disabilities, though such research...
Such aspirations were frequently expressed by people with disabilities and somewhat less by at-risk youth (see Figures 1&2). Among the trainees with disabilities, a full 50% found jobs in the formal sector. Of those, 40% worked at the technology center where they trained. Entrepreneurship, though often touted as a goal by program administrators, proved uncommon.
Most interviewees were confident of the value of their computer training and certification, but employers were not. This limitation is important because access to formal jobs depends heavily on employer perceptions and social connections. Effective technology training programs reach out to employers in a variety of ways, including disability awareness, placement recommendations, and post-placement follow-up. Individuals with hearing or visual impairments faced significant accessibility challenges — workplaces lack assistive technologies and, although most technology centers receive donated productivity software, many cannot afford accessibility software, such as screen readers.
Computers are widely perceived as transformative, even by the poorest and most disadvantaged. However, while most interviewees viewed ICTs as required for modern life, they associated use with young people. (Older respondents feared that they could not effectively use ICTs and assumed that youth could do a better job). In Brazil and Guatemala, interviewees cited technology second only to sports as an activity likely to attract at-risk youth away from illicit activities. People with disabilities reported being attracted to technology centers as spaces to build community and enhance self-esteem. Training programs are valued by both populations as sources of formal education and increased access to employment. At-risk youth saw technology skills training as a point of entry into the labor market and as a way to overcome stereotypes surrounding individuals from low-income neighborhoods.
Certification is most useful when the skills are relevant in the local labor-market and certificates are issued by an organization trusted by employers. For successful job outcomes, technology centers must cultivate employer relationships. Further, participants’ overall experience with centers was more positive when services went beyond ICT training, such as help with resume writing, job placement, and counseling.
We often found assistive technologies to be unreliable and unavailable. Having observed several innovative local solutions, we recommend funding small initiatives that promote local development of assistive technologies.Workplace access and regulatory compliance also needs to be improved. More coordination and collaboration among legislators and agencies already working in this space would also represents an important step.
Among both populations, the presence of program managers “they could identify with” enhanced participation. At-risk youth expressed encouragement when peers worked at the technology center — it showed the potential for finding work after training. Likewise, people with disabilities related better to trainers with disabilities. In a labor market where few people with disabilities have white-collar jobs, their presence as project administrators was important and symbolic — providing a model and increasing public visibility.